Program
Note: Keynotes will be in West Hall Auditorium A. Parallel sessions A will be in Nicely 412 and B in Nicely 414.
May 25
9:00-10:00 AM
10:00-11:30 AM 11:45-1:15 PM 1:15-2:45 PM 2:45-4:15 PM 4:30-6:00 PM |
Registration/Coffee
What does moral ‘autonomy’ mean? Self-legislation as political analogy Pauline Kleingeld, University of Groningen Parallel Session 1 Lunch TBA, Alix Cohen, University of Edinburgh Parallel Session 2 |
May 26
9:00-9:30 AM
9:30-11:00 AM 11:15-12:45 PM 12:45-2:15 PM 2:15-3:45 PM 4:00-5:30 PM |
Coffee
TBA, Kenneth Westphal, Bogazici University Parallel Session 3 Lunch TBA, Nicholas Stang, University of Toronto Parallel Session 4 |
May 27
9:00-9:30 AM
9:30-11:00 AM 11:15-12:45 PM 12:45-2:15 PM 2:15-3:45 PM 4:00-5:30 PM 8:00-9:30 PM |
Coffee
Parallel Session 5 Parallel Session 6 Lunch TBA, Andrew Chignell, University of Pennsylvania Parallel Session 7 TBA, Konstantin Pollok, University of South Carolina (at the Goethe Institute) |
Parallel Session 1
Group A
Gözde Yıldırım, Bogazici University
Understanding Intelligible Evil
Jakub Mácha, Masaryk University
The Computational Theory of Mind in Light of Kant’s Account of Teleolgoical Judgment
Group B
Martin Sticker, Trinity College Dublin
Kant, Eudaimonism, Consequentialism, and the Fact of Reason
Jeffrey L. Wilson, Loyola Marymount University
The Schematism of Possession in the Early Rechtslehre Draft
Group A
Gözde Yıldırım, Bogazici University
Understanding Intelligible Evil
Jakub Mácha, Masaryk University
The Computational Theory of Mind in Light of Kant’s Account of Teleolgoical Judgment
Group B
Martin Sticker, Trinity College Dublin
Kant, Eudaimonism, Consequentialism, and the Fact of Reason
Jeffrey L. Wilson, Loyola Marymount University
The Schematism of Possession in the Early Rechtslehre Draft
Parallel Session 2
Group A
Marita Rainsborough, University of Kiel/University of Hamburg
A Critical Analysis of Kant’s Universalism and Cosmopolitanism in African Philosophy
Anna-Maria C. Bartsch, Universität Kassel
Kant’s Account of the Beautiful and the Principle of Serendipity
Group B
Jonas Held, Universität Leipzig
Kant on Rules of Inference
Robert Watt, University of Cambridge
The Mystery of Kant’s Mereology
Group A
Marita Rainsborough, University of Kiel/University of Hamburg
A Critical Analysis of Kant’s Universalism and Cosmopolitanism in African Philosophy
Anna-Maria C. Bartsch, Universität Kassel
Kant’s Account of the Beautiful and the Principle of Serendipity
Group B
Jonas Held, Universität Leipzig
Kant on Rules of Inference
Robert Watt, University of Cambridge
The Mystery of Kant’s Mereology
Parallel Session 3
Group A
Apaar Kumar, Manipal Centre for Philosophy and Humanities
Kant and Spontaneity: The Absolute-Relative Debate
Henny Blomme, KU Leuven
Kant’s Table of Nothing: A New Interpretation
Group B
Andrew Stephenson, Humboldt University
Kant and Ibn-Sina on Possibility, Existence, and Necessity
Saniye Vatansever, Yeditepe University
Kant’s Two Conceptions of the Highest Good
Group A
Apaar Kumar, Manipal Centre for Philosophy and Humanities
Kant and Spontaneity: The Absolute-Relative Debate
Henny Blomme, KU Leuven
Kant’s Table of Nothing: A New Interpretation
Group B
Andrew Stephenson, Humboldt University
Kant and Ibn-Sina on Possibility, Existence, and Necessity
Saniye Vatansever, Yeditepe University
Kant’s Two Conceptions of the Highest Good
Parallel Session 4
Group A
Qodratullah Qorbani, Kharazmi University
Kant and the Demystification of Ethics and Religion
Seniye Tilev, Bogazici University
Hope in Kant
Group B
Anita Leirfall, University of Bergen
Kant on Absolute Space and the Feeling of Inner Difference of Directions
Peter Bornedal, The American University of Beirut
Thinking the ‘Thing-in-Itself’ in Post-Kantian Epistemology
Group A
Qodratullah Qorbani, Kharazmi University
Kant and the Demystification of Ethics and Religion
Seniye Tilev, Bogazici University
Hope in Kant
Group B
Anita Leirfall, University of Bergen
Kant on Absolute Space and the Feeling of Inner Difference of Directions
Peter Bornedal, The American University of Beirut
Thinking the ‘Thing-in-Itself’ in Post-Kantian Epistemology
Parallel Session 5
Group A
Lorenzo Mileti Nardo, University of Turin
Heuristics in Kant: General Applied Logic, Opinion, and Provisional Judgments
Achim Vesper, Goethe Universität Frankfurt
From the Idea of the Unconditioned to the Idea of Systematic Unity
Group B
Jakob Huber, London School of Economics and Political Science
Pragmatic Belief and Political Agency
Eva Buddeberg, University of Frankfurt
Kant’s Ethical Community as a Resource for Solidarity Interaction?
Group A
Lorenzo Mileti Nardo, University of Turin
Heuristics in Kant: General Applied Logic, Opinion, and Provisional Judgments
Achim Vesper, Goethe Universität Frankfurt
From the Idea of the Unconditioned to the Idea of Systematic Unity
Group B
Jakob Huber, London School of Economics and Political Science
Pragmatic Belief and Political Agency
Eva Buddeberg, University of Frankfurt
Kant’s Ethical Community as a Resource for Solidarity Interaction?
Parallel Session 6
Group A
Daniel Mendez, Boston University
Transcendental Freedom: The Third Antinomy and Kant’s Conception of Agency
Kevin Cedeño-Pacheco, CUNY Graduate Center
On the Relation Between Kant’s Theory of Moral Action and His Theory of Reflective Judgment
Group B
Lucas Thorpe, Bogazici University
Animal Impulses and Maxims
Jeremy Hovda, KU Leuven
Primal Indolence and Nature’s Goads in Kant’s Philosophy of Action
Group A
Daniel Mendez, Boston University
Transcendental Freedom: The Third Antinomy and Kant’s Conception of Agency
Kevin Cedeño-Pacheco, CUNY Graduate Center
On the Relation Between Kant’s Theory of Moral Action and His Theory of Reflective Judgment
Group B
Lucas Thorpe, Bogazici University
Animal Impulses and Maxims
Jeremy Hovda, KU Leuven
Primal Indolence and Nature’s Goads in Kant’s Philosophy of Action
Parallel Session 7
Group A
Michael Walschots, University of St. Andrews
Kant and Hutcheson on the Psychology of Moral Motivation
Kevin Busch, University of Oxford
Did Kant Solve Hume’s Problem of Induction?
Group A
Michael Walschots, University of St. Andrews
Kant and Hutcheson on the Psychology of Moral Motivation
Kevin Busch, University of Oxford
Did Kant Solve Hume’s Problem of Induction?